Product is mislabeled as Double Swivel Connector with Suction Port and is actually Double Swivel Connector without Suction port. If the incorrect component is not identified prior to clinical use, the incorrect connector would be replaced during the case without risk to the patient and could result in a short delay of the procedure.
King Systems
15 recalls • • Categories: Infusion Pumps, Surgical Instruments, Other Medical Devices
KLTD214 airways found inside KLTSD414 packages. The KLTSD414 airway has a lumen for use of a gastric suction tube; the KLTD214 airway does not include a lumen for a gastric suction tube.
On December 13, 2012, King Systems initiated a voluntary recall of one (1) case(s) (5) individual products) from one (1) lot [(IV1V3) 62 cases, 310 products]of King LTSD Oropharyngeal Airways because the package label indicated that the airway was a size 5 when in fact the airway in the package was a size 4. When King manufacturers a lot, all of the components are the same size, part number etc. I
King Systems received a customer complaint indicating that the customer had ordered a breathing circuit with a Latex breathing bag. The product they received contained a Latex breathing bag, but was labeled as non-latex.
Report that size 5 KLTD airways were packaged in pouches indicating a size of 2.5 and shipped to your facility. The correct size of the KLTD airway is clearly marked on the actual airway product and the physical size difference between 2.5 and 5 is distinct and obvious.
The firm received two complaints from a user facility in New Jersey regarding color-coded EtO sterilization indicators on the primary device packaging that did not undergo the expected color change. The complainant reported devices that had pink color indicators when the product packaging specified that the color should change from pink to yellow (or brown) if the product had subjected to an EtO
The firm received two complaints from a user facility in New Jersey regarding color-coded EtO sterilization indicators on the primary device packaging that did not undergo the expected color change. The complainant reported devices that had pink color indicators when the product packaging specified that the color should change from pink to yellow (or brown) if the product had subjected to an EtO
Class I - Dangerous
The firm received two complaints from a user facility in New Jersey regarding color-coded EtO sterilization indicators on the primary device packaging that did not undergo the expected color change. The complainant reported devices that had pink color indicators when the product packaging specified that the color should change from pink to yellow (or brown) if the product had subjected to an EtO
Class I - Dangerous
The firm received two complaints from a user facility in New Jersey regarding color-coded EtO sterilization indicators on the primary device packaging that did not undergo the expected color change. The complainant reported devices that had pink color indicators when the product packaging specified that the color should change from pink to yellow (or brown) if the product had subjected to an EtO
Class I - Dangerous
The firm received two complaints from a user facility in New Jersey regarding color-coded EtO sterilization indicators on the primary device packaging that did not undergo the expected color change. The complainant reported devices that had pink color indicators when the product packaging specified that the color should change from pink to yellow (or brown) if the product had subjected to an EtO
Class I - Dangerous
The firm received two complaints from a user facility in New Jersey regarding color-coded EtO sterilization indicators on the primary device packaging that did not undergo the expected color change. The complainant reported devices that had pink color indicators when the product packaging specified that the color should change from pink to yellow (or brown) if the product had subjected to an EtO
Class I - Dangerous
The firm received two complaints from a user facility in New Jersey regarding color-coded EtO sterilization indicators on the primary device packaging that did not undergo the expected color change. The complainant reported devices that had pink color indicators when the product packaging specified that the color should change from pink to yellow (or brown) if the product had subjected to an EtO
The firm received two complaints from a user facility in New Jersey regarding color-coded EtO sterilization indicators on the primary device packaging that did not undergo the expected color change. The complainant reported devices that had pink color indicators when the product packaging specified that the color should change from pink to yellow (or brown) if the product had subjected to an EtO
Class I - Dangerous
The firm received two complaints from a user facility in New Jersey regarding color-coded EtO sterilization indicators on the primary device packaging that did not undergo the expected color change. The complainant reported devices that had pink color indicators when the product packaging specified that the color should change from pink to yellow (or brown) if the product had subjected to an EtO
Class I - Dangerous
The firm received two complaints from a user facility in New Jersey regarding color-coded EtO sterilization indicators on the primary device packaging that did not undergo the expected color change. The complainant reported devices that had pink color indicators when the product packaging specified that the color should change from pink to yellow (or brown) if the product had subjected to an EtO