All Recalls

IFU update includes an update to the Device description, Intended Use/Indications for Use, Contraindications, Warnings, Precautions, Potential adverse events

Due to a software defect, the Philips StentBoost Live R2.0 might not process X-ray images of the current run and instead show an image processed in a previous run. The image shown could be from the same patient or from a different patient.

Cybersecurity Improvement Action-not equipped against potential cyber security threats

ODs of the standards too low(< 0.6 ODmax) may cause invalid runs, delayed patient results are possible

Sterility failure of the exterior of the syringe which may impact the device's ability to be laid on a sterile field.

There is a potential for misquantitation high results of negative samples.

Potential for a loose cylindrical pin on the Transport Guard that may result in the jamming of the locking mechanism causing the Transport Guard to not open or, if the locking pin is fully disengaged from the assembly, a full disassembly of the Transport Guard may occur, resulting in a delay of support if a product exchange is necessary.

Pontics, brackets, and customized orthodontic appliances were sold and distributed prior to completing the standard design control process, being documented, and released.

The accumulated dose is incorrectly displayed in certain situations. There are two situations that will result in the SmartStep displayed dose being inaccurately high.

The outer bag may be perforated or torn, which may result in a breach in the sterility of the kit.

A kit component, the PDI Prevantics Swab was recalled due to uncertain validation of test methods used to manufacture the products.

Distribution of Defibrillators that are not approved or cleared for distribution US Market.

Pontics, brackets, and customized orthodontic appliances were sold and distributed prior to completing the standard design control process, being documented, and released.

There is a quality issue with the three bolts that hold the CT balancing weights, which could create a safety issue.

It was found that the irradiated x-ray may exceed the xray radiation dose rate specified in CFR 1020.32 in some specific case of fluoroscopic mode due to inadequate adjusting criteria in installation.

For the automated multi-image-acquisition procedure Ortho x-ray collimation is set in a preparative stage for the entire examination area prior to the exam. During acquisition of each individual x-ray image, the x-ray collimator is automatically positioned in a way that the subsequent series of acquisition covers the defined field of view needed for each step. However, during the acquisition the collimation area displayed to the operator on the User Interface does not correctly represent the collimation area specified by the system. It indicates to the user an open collimator instead, e.g., the information displayed on the User Interface shows wider area of collimation than values preset prior to the examination. However, the collimation of the x-ray is performed correctly and always matches the examination area predefined by the user.

This calibrator lot did not meet acceptance criteria during ongoing stability testing. When a calibration is performed with this lot, controls may exceed the specified range in the Instructions for Use (IFU).