Implants & Prosthetics

The outer bag may be perforated or torn, which may result in a breach in the sterility of the kit.

The outer bag may be perforated or torn, which may result in a breach in the sterility of the kit.

Due to a software defect, the Philips StentBoost Live R2.0 might not process X-ray images of the current run and instead show an image processed in a previous run. The image shown could be from the same patient or from a different patient.

There is an incorrect statement regarding MR Compatibility in the BioPro Titanium MPJ implant IFU (IFU BP102303 rev 05) and patient implant cards (22266 rev 00) which indicates that the BioPro MPJ Implant has been tested for safety and compatibility in the MR Environment and is MR Conditional. MR Testing has not been conducted on the titanium version of the MPJ.

There is an incorrect statement regarding MR Compatibility in the BioPro Titanium MPJ implant IFU (IFU BP102303 rev 05) and patient implant cards (22266 rev 00) which indicates that the BioPro MPJ Implant has been tested for safety and compatibility in the MR Environment and is MR Conditional. MR Testing has not been conducted on the titanium version of the MPJ.

There is an incorrect statement regarding MR Compatibility in the BioPro Titanium MPJ implant IFU (IFU BP102303 rev 05) and patient implant cards (22266 rev 00) which indicates that the BioPro MPJ Implant has been tested for safety and compatibility in the MR Environment and is MR Conditional. MR Testing has not been conducted on the titanium version of the MPJ.

There is an incorrect statement regarding MR Compatibility in the BioPro Titanium MPJ implant IFU (IFU BP102303 rev 05) and patient implant cards (22266 rev 00) which indicates that the BioPro MPJ Implant has been tested for safety and compatibility in the MR Environment and is MR Conditional. MR Testing has not been conducted on the titanium version of the MPJ.

There is an incorrect statement regarding MR Compatibility in the BioPro Titanium MPJ implant IFU (IFU BP102303 rev 05) and patient implant cards (22266 rev 00) which indicates that the BioPro MPJ Implant has been tested for safety and compatibility in the MR Environment and is MR Conditional. MR Testing has not been conducted on the titanium version of the MPJ.

Products are mislabeled with the incorrect product identification on individual kit labeling.

There is an incorrect statement regarding MR Compatibility in the BioPro Titanium MPJ implant IFU (IFU BP102303 rev 05) and patient implant cards (22266 rev 00) which indicates that the BioPro MPJ Implant has been tested for safety and compatibility in the MR Environment and is MR Conditional. MR Testing has not been conducted on the titanium version of the MPJ.

There is an incorrect statement regarding MR Compatibility in the BioPro Titanium MPJ implant IFU (IFU BP102303 rev 05) and patient implant cards (22266 rev 00) which indicates that the BioPro MPJ Implant has been tested for safety and compatibility in the MR Environment and is MR Conditional. MR Testing has not been conducted on the titanium version of the MPJ.

There is an incorrect statement regarding MR Compatibility in the BioPro Titanium MPJ implant IFU (IFU BP102303 rev 05) and patient implant cards (22266 rev 00) which indicates that the BioPro MPJ Implant has been tested for safety and compatibility in the MR Environment and is MR Conditional. MR Testing has not been conducted on the titanium version of the MPJ.

There is an incorrect statement regarding MR Compatibility in the BioPro Titanium MPJ implant IFU (IFU BP102303 rev 05) and patient implant cards (22266 rev 00) which indicates that the BioPro MPJ Implant has been tested for safety and compatibility in the MR Environment and is MR Conditional. MR Testing has not been conducted on the titanium version of the MPJ.

There is an incorrect statement regarding MR Compatibility in the BioPro Titanium MPJ implant IFU (IFU BP102303 rev 05) and patient implant cards (22266 rev 00) which indicates that the BioPro MPJ Implant has been tested for safety and compatibility in the MR Environment and is MR Conditional. MR Testing has not been conducted on the titanium version of the MPJ.

The product was released for distribution without passing sterilization results, which could potentially lead to insufficient sterility of the product. The highest severity risk is infection leading to surgical intervention.

Due to Label/Pouch mix-up. Pouches incorrectly labeled. Incorrect shelf carton label or pouch label due to inadequate manufacturing line clearance. As a result of this labeling mix-up, there is the possibility of inadvertently selecting the incorrect coil size for the procedure potentially causing some harms like vessel damage, an inability to treat with said device and potential rupture of the aneurysm.

Stent Graft Systems built with specific batches of taper tip assemblies have the potential for the taper tip to detach from the delivery system. Detachment of the taper tip during the implant procedure may lead to a secondary intervention to attempt to remove the taper tip, either by endovascular retrieval or surgical conversion. There is also potential that the taper tip is intentionally left behind in the patient, at the physician's discretion, if not easily removable.

The products in scope underwent an incorrect rework operation for the porous plasma sprayed coating. Internal testing indicated that the parts may not have sufficient adhesion strength. The scope was identified to be all lots that were porous plasma coated or recoated at a vendor that were then reworked through the internal waterjet rework process. The waterjet rework process for porous plasma coating is not validated for products that were coated at a vendor.

There is a potential label mix between certain lots of Exeter V40 Cemented Hip (125mm) Stem and Exeter V40 Cemented Hip (150mm) Stem.

There is a potential label mix between certain lots of Exeter V40 Cemented Hip (125mm) Stem and Exeter V40 Cemented Hip (150mm) Stem.