Stryker Craniomaxillofacial Division

6 recalls Categories: Other Medical Devices, Implants & Prosthetics, Surgical Instruments

Stryker has become aware that the inhomogeneity of the filter paper might potentially compromise the ability of the filter to maintain a sterile barrier during post-sterilization shelf-life.

Sep 17, 2015 Other Medical Devices View Details →

Potential for implant deformation, implant mechanical stability too low, loss of barrier adhesion intra-operatively, implant damage, implant cracking off/breaking intra-operatively.

Dec 17, 2014 Implants & Prosthetics Nationwide View Details →

Potential for implant deformation, implant mechanical stability too low, loss of barrier adhesion intra-operatively, implant damage, implant cracking off/breaking intra-operatively.

Dec 17, 2014 Implants & Prosthetics Nationwide View Details →

Potential for implant damage, implant cracking off/breaking intra-operatively.

Dec 17, 2014 Implants & Prosthetics Nationwide View Details →

Article #81036 (MEDPOR Titan Max OFW - MTB - Right) reportedly contained article #81035 MEDPOR Titan Max OFW - MTB - Left. The appropriate articles were actually included in the shipment. However, the products had an incorrect barrier location.

Dec 17, 2014 Implants & Prosthetics Nationwide View Details →

Stryker received reports of the desiccant bag in the kit leaking silica gel granulate. This could increase exposure to anesthesia during surgical delay up to 60 minutes or inadvertent implantation of silica gel granulate which could cause foreign body reaction including inflammation and might lead to the need for revision surgery.

Jul 30, 2013 Surgical Instruments Nationwide View Details →